Part 1: You were asked to engage in a conversation for 15 minutes where you were not allowed to use any version of a symbolic language (no speaking, writing, or ASL).
Did you find this experiment difficult or easy? Explain. (5 pts)
I found this part of it more frustrating than difficult. Eventually I was able to get most of my point across, but it was frustrating and inefficient when I could have just said something and communicated more directly and effectively. To be honest my 6 year old son was the only person I could do the experiment with, and though we did end up just making faces at each other at one point, I did learn a lot about how difficult and frustrating it can be to communicate effectively without symbolic language.
What were the impressions of partners in the conversation? Did they alter their way of communicating with you because of your absence of symbolic communication? Describe. (5 pts)
There was a lot more guesswork involved. He would try to guess what I meant when I was trying to describe something and most of the time he got very close. However, since he knows my pattern of language so well, it would have been easier to guess my train of thought. I can't imagine how difficult it would have been if we were strangers, and even moreso, strangers with nothing in common, nothing to make comparisons of our non-verbal communication against.
Imagine that you and your partners in the conversation represent two different cultures meeting for the first time. Which culture has the advantage in communicating complex ideas? What attitudes might the speaking culture have toward the culture that does not use symbolic language? Identify individuals in our culture that have difficulty communicating with spoken language and explore how that affects how those who do speak interact with those individuals. (5 pts)
The culture with the symbolic language has the advantage of being able to communicate complex ideas amongst themselves. Symbolic language allows us to communicate a much more diverse and complex amount of information and respond much quicker to questions when we speak the same language. An attitude that one might adopt when dealling with another culture that is unable to communicate is that they are just not as smart or developed. The deaf community might fall under this generalization, but they are able to communicate massive amounts of information with ASL, so it would be wrong to assume this.
Part 2: You were asked to spend 15 minutes communicating without any physical embellishments, i.e., no hand signals, not vocal intonation, not head, facial, or body movements.
Were you able to last for the full 15 minutes of using only speech for communicating? What made this experiment difficult for you? (5 pts)
I was not able to last the entire 15 minutes with this portion of it. Though it was easier than the first part, being able to say words to your partner, there was a general seriousness and boring quality to the conversation that could not hold attention. I found it difficult not to laugh, or bring inflection to my tone when I wanted to get excited about something. The physical part was not that hard, but the actual monotonous tone of the conversation was very difficult to maintain.
How were your partners in this part of the experiment affected by your communication limitations? Explain. (5 pts)
Since I am usually very sarcastic, and I like to joke around, especially with my son, I think he got confused as to whether I was serious or not when it all sounded the same. It was hard to be serious when sounding and acting so monotonous though, so a lot of what I said to him was joking around with him but with a very neutral tone. He was just unable to determine whether I was exaggerating something or if I was actually serious because there was no cue to give him an idea.
What does this experiment say about our use of "signs" in our language, i.e., how important is non-speech language techniques in our ability to communicate effectively? (5 pts)
I believe that non-speech language techniques are extremely important. Body language, tone, inflection, etc. share just as much about what we are saying as the words themselves. It takes sight as well as sound in order to gain an impression of somebody, so by observing non-verbal cues you can learn a lot about what goes unsaid or implied.
Are there people who have difficulty reading body language? Describe the adaptive benefit to possessing the ability to read body language. Can you describe environmental conditions where there might be a benefit to not reading body language? (5 pts)
There probably are people that have difficulty reading boy language or they just outright ignore it. Being able to read body language is almost like when two animals come across each other and can tell whether they are challenging each other to a fight. Perhaps it is an adaptive benefit to avoid harm and confrontation by being able to read certain signals that tell us something is wrong (a threat).
The only environmental conditions where not reading body language might be an advantage is if we are in a condition where there is no threat and want to focus on keeping an open mind to strictly what somebody would say, not what we think they mean.
Part 3: There is a third component of language which we did not test in this experiment, and that is the importance of written language.
Do you think your experiment in Part 1 would have been easier if you had been permitted to use written language? Why or why not? Explain. (5 pts)
In small bits it would have been helpful just for clarification of certain specific words, and then the ideas could have been acted out. I believe that written language is definitely much more effective as a form of communication than just acting things out, but it would still take time and the gestures and other movements add depth to the words.
What advantage does written language provide to the culture that develops and uses it? (5 pts)
Written language allows a culture to not only develop its language, it helps to record it so that later on, it can be compared and the development is able to be seen through the change in words. This allows the language of the culture to be studied and documented.
What impact has written language had on "globalization", or the spread of ideas around the world?
Written language has allowed many ideas to spread throughout the word. It allows people that can write the same language to communicate with each other across vast distances. Facilitated by the use of the internet, these days, an idea can spread around the world overnight if it was popular enough.
(5 pts)