1. Rules or laws against killing are essentially a cultural universal, meaning all cultures have rules regarding the killing other people and the punishments for breaking these rules. How do the Yanomamo rules regarding killing and the consequences for breaking these rules differ from the rules in Western cultures in general? (5 pts)
Revenge killing seems to be an accepted retaliation for death in the Yanomamo. For our culture, killing is punishable by law and a trial is set out to see what the circumstances are before a punishment is made. Amongst the Yanomamo, it seems that there are general ways of behaving, but it can mostly be decided by the individual or the group how to act. There is no system of law and punishment set up.
2. Describe the process of revenge killings as it is expressed in Yanomamo populations. (5 pts)
The notion of bereavement in their language and culture is synonymous with an anger that leans towards violence. They perform killing raids on villages in which a member has killed one of their members. Most of the fights initially begin due to women.
3. Revenge killings are a dangerous for those who take part. What are the benefits of obtaining the status of unokais? How do they compare to the benefits of being a non-unokais? Why would a man choose to become an unokais instead of being a non-unokais? (10 pts) Unokais are those who have killed. Those who back out of raids or have no killed eventually acquire a status as a coward. The non-unokais wives become targeted by other males as receiving more attention. Therefore, there is a certain amount of status that is associated with those males who have killed others.
4. Identify and describe the relationship between revenge killings and these aspects of the Yanomamo culture. How do they influence and affect each other?
a. Political structure (5 pts), c. Kinship (5 pts)b. Social Status/Social Organization (5 pts),d. Marriage & Reproduction (5 pts
The leaders of the group come from the family with the largest descent group. They usually have the most kin amongst the group. The headmen usually have up to a dozen or more different wives. They either appeal to these wives as being better mates because they have killed, or they could have been acquired forcefully or through an agreement. They also have many children, expanding the amount of kin they have. Because the groups are organized by kinship, it is an obligation to protect the tribe and kin by violence. This becomes a part of the politics because the tribe is built on kin. Though the groups seem to be arranged by groups of kin, sometimes they split when there are disagreements. Some close kin can actually be separated due to marriage ties. If there is killing of their kin in another village by someone in their village, it does not necessarily mean they will side with the village that they reside in. That is why groups of kin are easier to group that actual physical villages when studying the behavior and motive of revenge killing.
5. Behaviors that are usually labeled as “anti-social”, such as killing other people, are generally thought to be a bad thing to do under most circumstances, other than defense. Why do we need laws against something that no one should want to do? Use your reading of the article to help you explain your answer. (10 pts)
We need laws in place as a standard of what is acceptable and not acceptable by the general population. By holding people accountable to these standards and setting up some method of punishment, it acts a deterrent for those that may be thinking of doing something wrong and know the consequences that will arise from those actions. In the Yanomamo, there are no sets of laws governing their rules against killing others. Therefore, when the benefits of killing and bringing that attention of themselves outweigh the costs of possibly being targeted by others, they go ahead with the killing raid, which seems to happen very often.
You say: "There is no system of law and punishment set up."
ReplyDeleteHmmm.... You don't see a retaliatory killing as a form of punishment for killing in the first place? There may not be a written form of laws and punishments, but there is a generally recognized pattern followed by the Yanomamo.
This is a very complex system. It required further explanation than you offered in part #2.
How does the rise in status of the unokais translate into actual benefits?
In the last paragraph you say: "when the benefits of killing and bringing that attention of themselves outweigh the costs of possibly being targeted by others, they go ahead with the killing raid..."
That is exactly correct. But as you point out, the benefits and costs are weighed, and it is these costs that serve as the pattern of rules and deterrents for the Yanomamo, just as our justice system serves as our deterrent. They don't have a formal system as we do, but they do have a system.
I really enjoyed reading your post. I do agree with you when you said that because we have our laws in place to hold people back from breaking the law. I think if the Yanomamo people would have such a violent atmosphere if they had laws place. I also think that if they had a formal language they would be able to communicate with each other in a non-violent way. Good post!
ReplyDelete~Heather L. Gault
I agree that are reason the Yanomamo act in revenge killings is due to the lack of laws with consequences of killing. If they had some sort of law that gave a consequence, maybe they wouldn't feel such a vengeance on the other? Maybe they still will? I feel the Yanomamo's revenge killings is a part of their culture (laws or not). Just as we adapted to punishment against killings as survival and our revenge, the Yanomamo took a different approach. :)
ReplyDeleteI think that the Yanomamo act in revenge killings to punish the murder along with just getting revenge. They might not have a written law but they all follow the same rules. An eye for an eye.
ReplyDelete